EN FORMATO UTÓPICO / RECONSTRUCCIÓN DEL SALADO: septiembre 2015

miércoles, 30 de septiembre de 2015

GIBELLINA/REPROGRAMACION DE CIUDAD DESTRUIDA POR TERREMOTO

http://www.gibellina.siciliana.it/popup/popup9.html

viernes, 25 de septiembre de 2015

10 PREGUNTAS SOBRE EL PROGRAMA A KOOLHAAS Y TSCHUMI

Preguntas de Ana Miljacki, Amanda Reeser Lawrence y Ashley Schafer.

2. What is the relationship between program and form? And event? And politics?

Tschumi:

The relationship between program and form can be one of reciprocity, indifference, or conflict. Let me explain. Reciprocity is when you shape the program so that it coincides with the form, or shape the form so that it reciprocates the configuration you gave to the program. Indifference is when a selected form can accommodate any program, often resulting in a deterministic form and an indeterminate program. And with conflict you let program and form purposefully clash—i.e., pole vaulting in the chapel or the running track through the library reading room—so as to generate unexpected events...

Koolhaas :

We have learned that there is no given relationship between program and form. In the past three years we’ve engaged in radical experimentation that at times produced an extreme relationship between program and form while at others produced no relationship, which simply shows how unbelievably unstable, unspecific, and also inconsistent it can be. It is impossible to abstract from these projects a single direction for the office, but the relationship of form and program is always a large preoccupation...

SEGUIR LEYENDO

BERNARD TSCHUMI/ 6 CONCEPTOS: DE-FAMILIARIZACION,SHOCK, DES-ESTRUCTURACION, SUPERPOSICION, CRUCE PROGRAMATICO Y EVENTO

Bernard Tschumi - Six Concepts Excerpt from Architecture and Disjunction

CONCEPT I: Technologies of Defamiliarization :

In the mid-1970s small pockets of resistance began to form as architects in various parts of the world -- England, Austria, the United States, Japan (for the most part, in advanced postindustrial cultures) -- started to take advantage of this condition of fragmentation and superficiality and to turn it against itself. If the prevalent ideology was one of familiarity -- familiarity with known images, derived from 1920s modernism or eighteenth century classicism -- maybe one's role was to defamiliarize. If the new, mediated world echoed and reinforced our dismantled reality, maybe, just maybe, one should take advantage of such dismantling, celebrate fragmentation by celebrating the culture of differences, by accelerating and intensifying the loss of certainty, of center, of history.

SEGUIR LEYENDO